
In reading Doctorow's
Ragtime we're given a controversial form of access to the past. By blurring the boundaries between fact and fiction, Doctorow pulls readers into a historical setting and enables us to identify quickly with the characters. This is certainly an effective technique for obvious reasons, but it's also true that any time a writer draws from "real life" or from history to create his or her characters, exactly what constitutes "truth" becomes the next question, one to which everyone has a different answer. As you can see, Doctorow takes great liberty in imagining alternative lives for historical figures. For instance, the interaction between Emma Goldman and Evelyn Nesbitt (and Younger Brother, hiding in the closet) is a bit racy, and the conversations between Pierpoint Morgan and Henry Ford are somewhat provocative as well.
So I'd like you to think about the idea of fact vs. fiction, and respond to Doctorow's method of storytelling and boundary blurring.
Please post your response no later than Saturday, November 11.